Is Germany stuck in its own laws while drones threaten the country? 03/10/2025 | Marco Giulio Barone

Germany faced a significant aviation security disruption tonight, when unidentified drones forced Munich Airport to suspend operations for nearly seven hours, affecting thousands of passengers and highlighting the nation's vulnerability to emerging aerial threats. This incident represents the latest escalation in the series of mysterious drone activities across European airspace that authorities increasingly suspect may be linked to hybrid warfare operations.

Munich Airport experienced a complete operational shutdown from approximately 10:18 PM local time on October 2 until 5:00 AM on October 3, 2025, after multiple drone sightings in the airport vicinity. The disruption resulted in the cancellation of 17 departing flights, affecting nearly 3,000 passengers, while 15 incoming flights were diverted to airports in Stuttgart, Nuremberg, Vienna, and Frankfurt. Airport authorities provided emergency accommodations including camp beds, blankets, beverages, and snacks for stranded passengers.

Despite deploying police helicopters and specialized teams, authorities were unable to determine the exact number, type, or origin of the drones due to nighttime conditions. The timing was particularly significant as it occurred on the eve of German Unity Day, a national holiday, and during the final weekend of Munich's Oktoberfest festival.

Similar incidents have occurred throughout September and early October 2025. In late September, unidentified drones conducted what appears to be systematic surveillance of critical German infrastructure in Schleswig-Holstein state. These drones targeted power plants, a university hospital, military installations, the ThyssenKrupp naval shipyard in Kiel, and the official residence of the state government. The drones were observed following specific flight patterns over the Kiel Canal and are suspected of monitoring the Heide oil refinery, which supplies fuel to Hamburg Airport.

Germany's response to the growing drone threat has exposed (known) significant gaps in the nation's aerial defence capabilities. Like all NATO countries which have excessively reduced their defence budgets between 2005 and 2022, Germany too is unprepared. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius recently acknowledged that Germany is "really behind when it comes to defending against" drone threats.

Worse still, the country's defence infrastructure faces a complex jurisdictional challenge where responsibilities are divided between the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces) for external military threats and 16 separate state police forces for internal security matters. Currently, the Bundeswehr cannot intervene against drones detected over civilian infrastructure such as airports or industrial sites, as this falls under police jurisdiction. This fragmented approach would have created operational delays and coordination challenges that limit Germany's ability to respond quickly to drone threats.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has characterized the drone threat as "high" and announced comprehensive measures to address Germany's vulnerabilities. The government plans to establish a joint drone defence centre that will coordinate capabilities between federal and state authorities, combining resources from the Bundeswehr, state police, federal police, and the federal criminal office. Dobrindt announced plans to amend both the Aviation Security Act and the Federal Police Act to provide legal authority for shooting down unauthorized drones. The proposed legislation would specifically allow the Bundeswehr to provide "official assistance" to police forces when civilian capacity proves inadequate, including the authority to destroy threatening drones.

Bavarian Premier Markus Söder has called for even more aggressive measures, demanding immediate authority for police to "shoot down drones instead of waiting" and proposing the creation of an "Iron Dome for Germany" to protect critical infrastructure and military installations. Söder announced that Bavaria would address this issue in a cabinet meeting and called for fast-track federal legislation.  However, these proposals face resistance from police unions, which argue that expanding military involvement in domestic security operations violates constitutional principles and creates unnecessary bureaucratic delays. Police union chairman Jochen Koppelke emphasized that police forces are "always available" while the Bundeswehr "reacts too slowly to these spontaneous threats".

Yet, the German military does have some drone capabilities that, although insufficient, might contribute to protect German infrastructure. For instance, the Bundeswehr has ordered 19 SKYRANGER anti-aircraft systems from Rheinmetall, designed specifically to counter drone swarms and aerial threats. Unfortunately, these systems will not be delivered until 2027, leaving a significant capability gap. The SKYRANGER 30 system (pictured), mounted on an 8x8 BOXER armoured vehicle, features a 30mm (or a 35mm in some variants) cannon with programmable airburst ammunition and integrated surface-to-air missiles specifically designed for counter-drone operations. It is evident that, given the magnitude of the threat, Germany's current order is largely insufficient to trigger mass production and a significant intervention capability against swarms. The country would need 5-600 systems, and Rheinmetall has declared it could produce as many as 200 per year, should large orders come (new production sites would likely be required).

In addition, Germany has procured the R&S ARDRONIS counter-drone system from Rohde & Schwarz. The system has been deployed by both German federal law enforcement agencies and the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces) since 2020, but the exact number of units procured remains classified for security reasons. For the Bundeswehr specifically, GUARDION systems equipped with the R&S ARDRONIS were commissioned through cooperation partner ESG for field camp protection in deployment areas. The system provides detection, classification, and direction-finding capabilities for drone remote controls, along with electronic countermeasure capabilities to disrupt unauthorized drones thanks to Hensoldt's SPEXER 2000D 3D radars, NIGHT OWL M cameras, and ESG’s TARANIS command and control system, the ARDRONIS radio direction finders from Rohde & Schwarz, and effectors from HP Wüst and Diehl Defence. The R&S ARDRONIS family has proven operationally successful, with over 100 systems sold to various customers worldwide. Its latest versions like ARDRONIS EFFECT provide advanced multi-band jamming capabilities to counter jam-resistant drones and drone swarms. The system can detect and identify commercial drone activity across the frequency range from 20 MHz to 6 GHz, covering all frequency bands used by commercial off-the-shelf drones. Once again, it is very likely that the number of systems procured is today insufficient to offer significant coverage against sensitive and critical infrastructure.

The drone incidents have highlighted Germany's broader infrastructure vulnerabilities amid what officials describe as daily threats to critical systems. Recent cyberattacks on security software used by multiple European airports, including Berlin Airport, occurred simultaneously with the drone sightings, suggesting potential coordination between different forms of hybrid warfare. Germany's digital infrastructure organization Bitkom estimates that cyberattacks have cost the German economy €289 billion ($339 billion), with approximately 68% attributed to criminal syndicates while half of surveyed companies trace at least one attack to Russia. The Deutsche Bahn rail network has also experienced "nearly daily attacks" throughout 2025, including sabotage of critical rail lines connecting major cities.

While German authorities have not definitively attributed the recent drone incidents to any specific actor, the timing and sophistication of the operations have raised suspicions about state-level involvement.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed allegations of Russian involvement in the drone incidents. During a summit in Sochi he (ironically) stated that he would refrain from flying drones over Denmark in the future. The Kremlin continues to deny any connection to the European drone activities despite widespread suspicions among NATO allies.

The German government has described the current security environment as unprecedented since World War II, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz acknowledging the severity of the threats facing the nation. A recent PWC study revealed that 67% of Germans fear "hybrid attacks" from Russia, with nearly half believing their government is inadequately prepared to defend against such threats (emotional thought: same citizens criticizing defence expenditures in the past decades).

The October 3 Munich Airport incident represents a significant escalation in what appears to be a systematic campaign of aerial provocation and intimidation targeting European critical infrastructure. Germany's response, including legislative reforms and enhanced defence capabilities, reflects the urgency with which European nations are addressing this emerging security challenge that blends traditional military threats with innovative hybrid warfare techniques. Better late than never…

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook and X.


Share on: